The agents of modern animal agriculture have a talent for obfuscation. The miseries of confined animals are hidden within dim barracks and their brutal deaths behind the blank walls of slaughterhouses. Cheerful packaging and advertisements, bucolic brand names, and labels such as “organic,” “natural” and “humane” obscure the grim, mechanical and perverse methods of an industry that runs on the exploitation of sentient creatures. When activists attempt to reveal these practices to the public through documentation, the industry defends its secrecy by seeking to criminalize such revelations (see our action alert on the country’s latest “ag-gag” bill). And when the use of its harshest instruments is threatened by the prospect of legislative reform, the industry does its best to confound that progress by muddling prospective laws.
Factory farming interests are at it again in Oregon and Washington, where coalitions of animal welfare, food safety and environmental groups, along with concerned citizens, are now grappling against entrenched industry powers over the fate of the two states’ nearly 8.5 million egg-laying hens.
In an April Making Hay post, I told you about our efforts to give the voters of Washington and Oregon a say over the treatment of hens in their states. In both cases, producers have responded by exerting their influence over the legislative process.
In Washington, agribusiness lobbied for SB 5487, which was signed into law by Governor Christine Gregoire on May 11. This measure extends illusory reform while codifying inhumane practices by requiring that egg-laying hen operations meet the certification standards of the United Egg Producers, an industry group that promotes intensive confinement. The new measure mandates a very minor increase in cage size and allows producers until 2026 to comply with even that meager change. Meanwhile in Oregon, S.B. 805, which at the beginning of the current session promised real reform, has been crippled by amendment after amendment. Now it too promises to provide a veneer of legitimacy while allowing rank mistreatment to continue, barely altered, beneath it.
This manipulation is an affront not only to those concerned with animal welfare but also to those concerned with the integrity of our legislative process. I am heartened to see coalitions in Washington and Oregon coming together to challenge the factory farming industry through citizens’ initiatives. Volunteers are hard at work collecting the signatures needed to put battery cage bans on Washington’s November 2011 ballot and Oregon’s November 2012 ballot.
Throughout the country, our efforts to expose and outlaw factory farming cruelty, and to increase public awareness of farm animal welfare, are meeting with success. This has goaded the industry to bolster the walls of its factories against efforts to ease the suffering of those within. In the scales of agribusiness logic, an inch or two of floor space in a metal cage weighs more than the pain of the bird who stands on it. But we know how valuable the life of that bird is. We know that each hen matters. And we know that each volunteer and each signature matters. This is a crucial moment. As the industry musters itself to resist our progress, we need the weight of every compassionate voice to urge our momentum forward. Right now, Farm Sanctuary volunteers are on the ground in Washington, gathering thousands of signatures across the state, and we are sending even more activists starting next week. Please learn more about how you can help in Washington and Oregon and join us in this important work.